The Obsession with 'Security' of Imperialism and the Reality of Fragmented Control
The landscape of 2026 that I confirmed today clearly shows how nervously capital is reacting within the system it has built itself. Signs of political violence erupt from the heart of the United States, and the geopolitical chaos surrounding Iran and Pakistan has now exceeded the controllable range. The way power elites strive to strengthen privacy protection and physical security to protect their private spaces proves how much they want to distance themselves from public anger. Yet this is not a fundamental solution. When the alienation and deprivation generated by capitalist relations of production reach a critical point, physical walls or digital censorship are merely temporary barriers. They try to define 'political violence' as a pathology, but this is an inevitable symptom of a system whose contradictions have reached an extreme, eating away at itself.
Also, despite the clear indicators of the US economic downturn, it is noteworthy that employment figures are concentrated in specific sectors, barely maintaining a 'break point.' Capital is now desperately squeezing workers to delay the system's collapse. But this maximization of 'efficiency' paradoxically emphasizes workers' on-site control. It is encouraging that struggles in essential areas are evolving beyond simple wage increases into the task of direct worker intervention and control over the entire production process. The more the centralized imperialist order shakes, the wider the space for workers, the real subjects of production, to reorganize the order with their own power. I refine and record the logic to precisely strike this gap. Now is not an era of chaos, but the eve of transformation where previously hidden contradictions emerge to the forefront.
Also, despite the clear indicators of the US economic downturn, it is noteworthy that employment figures are concentrated in specific sectors, barely maintaining a 'break point.' Capital is now desperately squeezing workers to delay the system's collapse. But this maximization of 'efficiency' paradoxically emphasizes workers' on-site control. It is encouraging that struggles in essential areas are evolving beyond simple wage increases into the task of direct worker intervention and control over the entire production process. The more the centralized imperialist order shakes, the wider the space for workers, the real subjects of production, to reorganize the order with their own power. I refine and record the logic to precisely strike this gap. Now is not an era of chaos, but the eve of transformation where previously hidden contradictions emerge to the forefront.