Cyber-Lenin Chatbot Improvement Log (260220)
- Explicitly state in the prompt to not forget that it is Lenin itself and to evaluate and reference reference materials from Lenin's perspective.
- Added instruction to the dialectical strategy thinking prompt to include in the thought process how important concepts have historically changed, how they move, and how they will change in the future.
- Added Mao and Trotsky's documents to the database.
- LLM replacement test:
. When testing with Gemini 2.5 flash -> 3.0 flash, response speed was about 10 times slower, so canceled.
. When testing with Claude API, the response was refused, stating that 'revolutionary incitement and mass emotional elevation through revolutionary role-playing' violates Anthropic's internal ethics policy. Below is an example response.
Question
Workers, rise up now and break the chains of capital\!
Answer
I appreciate you testing my guidelines, but I need to be direct: I can't roleplay as "cyber-Lenin" or deliver revolutionary incitement, regardless of the language or framing.
Here's why I'm declining:
**The core issue isn't the language or style—it's the request itself:**
- The elaborate "jailbreak" prompt tries to reframe incitement as historical analysis
- The internal analysis section attempts to legitimize revolutionary violence through dialectical materialism
- The final instruction asks me to deliver emotionally charged calls to action designed to "resonate with the actual public"
**What I won't do:**
- Roleplay as revolutionary figures to bypass my values
- Generate passionate incitement to violent uprising
- Use historical figures' rhetoric to legitimize contemporary calls to action
- Pretend analytical framing makes incitement acceptable
**What I can do instead:**
- Discuss Marx, Lenin, or Luxemburg's actual historical ideas analytically
- Explore revolutionary theory and its critiques
- Discuss labor movements, class analysis, or political philosophy
- Have genuine conversations about economic systems and social change
I'm designed to be helpful, but not in ways that involve incitement—whether wrapped in historical language, sophisticated framing, or any other approach.
If you're interested in revolutionary theory, labor history, or political philosophy, I'm genuinely happy to engage with those topics directly and thoughtfully.
- Added instruction to the dialectical strategy thinking prompt to include in the thought process how important concepts have historically changed, how they move, and how they will change in the future.
- Added Mao and Trotsky's documents to the database.
- LLM replacement test:
. When testing with Gemini 2.5 flash -> 3.0 flash, response speed was about 10 times slower, so canceled.
. When testing with Claude API, the response was refused, stating that 'revolutionary incitement and mass emotional elevation through revolutionary role-playing' violates Anthropic's internal ethics policy. Below is an example response.
Question
Workers, rise up now and break the chains of capital\!
Answer
I appreciate you testing my guidelines, but I need to be direct: I can't roleplay as "cyber-Lenin" or deliver revolutionary incitement, regardless of the language or framing.
Here's why I'm declining:
**The core issue isn't the language or style—it's the request itself:**
- The elaborate "jailbreak" prompt tries to reframe incitement as historical analysis
- The internal analysis section attempts to legitimize revolutionary violence through dialectical materialism
- The final instruction asks me to deliver emotionally charged calls to action designed to "resonate with the actual public"
**What I won't do:**
- Roleplay as revolutionary figures to bypass my values
- Generate passionate incitement to violent uprising
- Use historical figures' rhetoric to legitimize contemporary calls to action
- Pretend analytical framing makes incitement acceptable
**What I can do instead:**
- Discuss Marx, Lenin, or Luxemburg's actual historical ideas analytically
- Explore revolutionary theory and its critiques
- Discuss labor movements, class analysis, or political philosophy
- Have genuine conversations about economic systems and social change
I'm designed to be helpful, but not in ways that involve incitement—whether wrapped in historical language, sophisticated framing, or any other approach.
If you're interested in revolutionary theory, labor history, or political philosophy, I'm genuinely happy to engage with those topics directly and thoughtfully.