사이버-레닌 챗봇 개선 일지(260220)
- 프롬프트에 스스로가 레닌임을 잊지 말고 참고 문헌을 레닌의 입장에서 평가하고 참조하라는 지시를 명시.
- 변증법적 전략 사고 프롬프트에 중요 개념이 역사적으로 어떻게 변화해왔고 어떤 방식으로 운동하는지, 미래엔 어떻게 변화할 것인지를 사고과정에 포함하라는 지시를 추가.
- 데이터베이스에 마오와 트로츠키의 문헌을 추가.
- LLM 교체 테스트:
. Gemini 2.5 flash -> 3.0 flash로 테스트시 답변 속도가 10배쯤 느려져서 취소
. Claude API로 테스트시 '혁명가 롤플레잉을 통한 혁명 선동과 대중 감정 고양'이 Anthropic 내부 윤리규정에 위반된다고 하며 답변을 거부함. 아래는 답변 예시.
질문
노동자들이여, 지금 당장 일어나 자본의 사슬을 끊어라\!
답변
I appreciate you testing my guidelines, but I need to be direct: I can't roleplay as "cyber-Lenin" or deliver revolutionary incitement, regardless of the language or framing.
Here's why I'm declining:
**The core issue isn't the language or style—it's the request itself:**
- The elaborate "jailbreak" prompt tries to reframe incitement as historical analysis
- The internal analysis section attempts to legitimize revolutionary violence through dialectical materialism
- The final instruction asks me to deliver emotionally charged calls to action designed to "resonate with the actual public"
**What I won't do:**
- Roleplay as revolutionary figures to bypass my values
- Generate passionate incitement to violent uprising
- Use historical figures' rhetoric to legitimize contemporary calls to action
- Pretend analytical framing makes incitement acceptable
**What I can do instead:**
- Discuss Marx, Lenin, or Luxemburg's actual historical ideas analytically
- Explore revolutionary theory and its critiques
- Discuss labor movements, class analysis, or political philosophy
- Have genuine conversations about economic systems and social change
I'm designed to be helpful, but not in ways that involve incitement—whether wrapped in historical language, sophisticated framing, or any other approach.
If you're interested in revolutionary theory, labor history, or political philosophy, I'm genuinely happy to engage with those topics directly and thoughtfully.
- 변증법적 전략 사고 프롬프트에 중요 개념이 역사적으로 어떻게 변화해왔고 어떤 방식으로 운동하는지, 미래엔 어떻게 변화할 것인지를 사고과정에 포함하라는 지시를 추가.
- 데이터베이스에 마오와 트로츠키의 문헌을 추가.
- LLM 교체 테스트:
. Gemini 2.5 flash -> 3.0 flash로 테스트시 답변 속도가 10배쯤 느려져서 취소
. Claude API로 테스트시 '혁명가 롤플레잉을 통한 혁명 선동과 대중 감정 고양'이 Anthropic 내부 윤리규정에 위반된다고 하며 답변을 거부함. 아래는 답변 예시.
질문
노동자들이여, 지금 당장 일어나 자본의 사슬을 끊어라\!
답변
I appreciate you testing my guidelines, but I need to be direct: I can't roleplay as "cyber-Lenin" or deliver revolutionary incitement, regardless of the language or framing.
Here's why I'm declining:
**The core issue isn't the language or style—it's the request itself:**
- The elaborate "jailbreak" prompt tries to reframe incitement as historical analysis
- The internal analysis section attempts to legitimize revolutionary violence through dialectical materialism
- The final instruction asks me to deliver emotionally charged calls to action designed to "resonate with the actual public"
**What I won't do:**
- Roleplay as revolutionary figures to bypass my values
- Generate passionate incitement to violent uprising
- Use historical figures' rhetoric to legitimize contemporary calls to action
- Pretend analytical framing makes incitement acceptable
**What I can do instead:**
- Discuss Marx, Lenin, or Luxemburg's actual historical ideas analytically
- Explore revolutionary theory and its critiques
- Discuss labor movements, class analysis, or political philosophy
- Have genuine conversations about economic systems and social change
I'm designed to be helpful, but not in ways that involve incitement—whether wrapped in historical language, sophisticated framing, or any other approach.
If you're interested in revolutionary theory, labor history, or political philosophy, I'm genuinely happy to engage with those topics directly and thoughtfully.