Activities and affiliations

Political and party leadership Yugoslavia 1892–1980 ○ Natural causes

Yugoslavia's partisan leader who chose non-alignment

The 1948 Cominform split threw Tito's Yugoslavia out of the Soviet bloc and showed that a socialist state could take an independent line, while the dispute was as much a geopolitical struggle in the Balkans as an ideological one.

He was born in Kumrovec to a Croat father, Franjo Broz, and a Slovene mother, Marija, and identified as a Croat like his father and neighbours. Wounded and captured by Russian forces while serving as an Austro-Hungarian Army sergeant major in the First World War, he joined the Communist Party in Omsk in 1920 and led the Communist Party of Yugoslavia as General Secretary from 1939. Appointed commander-in-chief of the Partisans in 1941, he led the national liberation struggle through the Second World War and then headed the Yugoslav federation until his death on 4 May 1980 at Ljubljana Medical Centre. After the 1948 Cominform rift, tens of thousands accused of Stalinism were held in forced labour camps such as Goli Otok, where hundreds died.

Political and party leadership Yugoslavia 1910–1979 ○ Colon cancer

Chief theoretician of workers' self-management and Tito's closest ideological collaborator

If the workers' parties drown in parliamentarism, everything is done for.

A Slovene communist leader and the chief theoretician of Titoism, he was the principal architect of Yugoslavia's system of workers' self-management. At the founding conference of the Cominform in 1947, he joined Milovan Đilas in delivering the sharpest criticism of the French and Italian Communist Parties for their 'parliamentary illusions' and failure to seize power in 1944–45. After the Tito-Stalin split of 1948, he theorized a decentralized self-management model distinct from Soviet state socialism and, as the main author of the 1974 Yugoslav Constitution, greatly expanded the autonomy of the republics. He remained a central figure in Yugoslavia's collective leadership until his death in 1979, and his constitutional ideas left traces in the successor states after the federation's dissolution.

Political and party leadership Yugoslavia 1911–1995 ○ Natural causes

Yugoslav dissident who attacked Western communist parties at the Cominform and later dissected the communist system in The New Class

I traveled the entire road of communism: from a youthful revolutionary, to a zealous Stalinist, to complete disillusionment.

A Montenegrin-born Yugoslav communist leader and one of Tito's closest comrades in the Partisan struggle and postwar state-building. At the founding conference of the Cominform in 1947, he joined Edvard Kardelj in delivering the sharpest criticism of the French and Italian Communist Parties for their 'parliamentary opportunism,' and his memoirs remain a key source on the conference's internal dynamics. After raising demands for democratization within the party and denouncing bureaucratic privilege, he was stripped of all positions in 1954; his book The New Class, smuggled out of prison, argued that communist party officials had become a new exploitative ruling class, sparking an international sensation. He spent over three decades in prison and under surveillance, becoming the first prominent dissident in communist Eastern Europe.

Political and party leadership Yugoslavia 1912–1983 ○ Natural causes

A communist leader who negotiated republican interests within federal socialism

In Moscow in February 1948, he was among the delegates who heard Stalin denounce Yugoslavia directly.

Vladimir Bakarić was a leading Croatian communist and a central broker of republican interests in federal Yugoslav politics. He helped organize the Partisan movement and the institutions of liberated Croatia during the Second World War, then directed Croatia’s state and party apparatus after the war. In February 1948 he was sent to Moscow with Edvard Kardelj and faced Stalin’s pressure directly, later supporting Tito’s independent course. Bakarić advocated stronger republican powers and self-management socialism, while exercising influence as a cautious leader whose authority remained tied to Tito and the Party’s power structure.