The historian who made the Spanish Civil War a global narrative
Thomas began The Spanish Civil War without knowing a word of Spanish, and the book was banned by the Franco regime and smuggled into Spain as a clandestine best-seller.
Hugh Thomas was an English historian whose 1961 The Spanish Civil War made a large, readable survey of the conflict available to an international audience. Drawing on printed diplomatic sources, participant accounts and interviews, he presented the Republican struggle and its internal violence without simply adopting either Communist or anti-Communist polemic. The book became a clandestine bestseller in Francoist Spain, was repeatedly revised, and remained a foundational point of reference despite factual and interpretive criticisms. His later work ranged across Cuba, the Spanish empire and world history, while his political career moved from Labour to the Conservatives and then the Liberal Democrats.
Career timeline
1931–1952Born at Windsor; educated at Sherborne School and Cambridge, studying history
1952–1953First-class History Tripos result; president of the Cambridge Union Society
1954–1957Served in the British Foreign Office, including the UK delegation to the UN Disarmament Commission and the Paris embassy
1957Lectured at the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst and published his first novel, The World's Game
1961Published The Spanish Civil War; won the Somerset Maugham Award in 1962
1966–1976Professor of History at the University of Reading
1971–2014Published major works on Cuba, the conquest of Mexico, the Spanish empire and world history
1981–2017Created Baron Thomas of Swynnerton and sat in the House of Lords; died in 2017
Romanian-American political scientist and authority on the 1989 revolutions
In Bucharest in June 1990, he witnessed miners violently crushing anti-government protesters, an experience he said gave him insight into 'barbarity in its crassest, most revolting form.'
Born into a Romanian communist elite family and defecting in 1981, he is a political scientist who has analysed Stalinism and the collapse of East European communist systems from a comparative politics perspective. His 2003 Stalinism for All Seasons provided a definitive synthesis of Romanian communism, and in 2006 he chaired the Presidential Commission for the Study of the Communist Dictatorship, steering the country's landmark reckoning with its past. His 2009 article on the causes, meanings and consequences of 1989 became a benchmark for scholarship on the revolutions, arguing that ethnic conflict and authoritarian backsliding in the aftermath do not diminish their 'generous message' and colossal impact.
Career timeline
1974–1981Sociologist, Institute of Typified Buildings Design, Bucharest
1983–1990Researcher, Foreign Policy Research Institute, Philadelphia
1985–1990Lecturer, University of Pennsylvania
1990–Professor of Politics, University of Maryland, College Park
1998–2004Editor, East European Politics and Societies
2006President, Presidential Commission for the Analysis of the Communist Dictatorship in Romania
2009Published 'The Revolutions of 1989: Causes, Meanings, Consequences' in Contemporary European History
The scholar who read 1989 as liberal democracy's endpoint
In 1989 he wrote: “What we may be witnessing is not just the end of the Cold War, but the end of history as such.”
Francis Fukuyama is an American political scientist and scholar of international politics who has compared the formation of states, institutions, and political orders. His 1989 essay “The End of History?” interpreted the end of the Cold War and the spread of liberal democracy as a point reached in humanity’s ideological evolution, making it one of the defining claims in debates over what 1989 meant. He expanded the argument in The End of History and the Last Man (1992), while later work stressed state capacity, the rule of law, and accountability, qualifying any simple early optimism.
Career timeline
1974B.A. in Classics, Cornell University
1979–1981Ph.D. study and doctorate in Political Science, Harvard University
1979–1989Political scientist, RAND Corporation
1981–1982Member, Policy Planning Staff, U.S. Department of State
1989Published “The End of History?” in The National Interest
1992Published The End of History and the Last Man
2001–2010Professor of International Political Economy, Johns Hopkins University
2010–presentSenior Fellow, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University
British historian who coined 'refolution' to define the peaceful revolutions of 1989
Meeting Václav Havel in a Prague basement pub on 23 November 1989, he offered this prediction: 'In Poland it took ten years, in Hungary ten months, in East Germany ten weeks: perhaps in Czechoslovakia it will take ten days!'
British historian, Oxford professor of European studies, and Guardian columnist who has chronicled the contemporary history of Central and Eastern Europe and the collapse of communist regimes. As an eyewitness to the revolutions of 1989 in Warsaw, Budapest, Berlin, and Prague, he recorded the unfolding of civil resistance in The Magic Lantern (1990) and coined the term 'refolution', a fusion of reform and revolution, to characterize the peaceful, negotiated nature of these systemic transitions. Called a 'historian of the present' by George Kennan, he has spent four decades writing on European freedom and democracy; his 2017 Charlemagne Prize and other international honours reflect work that has shaped both scholarly debate and policymaking.
Career timeline
1980First Western journalist to report from the Gdańsk Lenin Shipyard strike; met Lech Wałęsa
1986–1987Fellow, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars
1989Witnessed the 1989 revolutions in Warsaw, Budapest, Berlin, and Prague; wrote The Magic Lantern (1990)
2000–Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University
2004–Professor of European Studies, Oxford; Guardian international affairs columnist
2017Awarded the Charlemagne Prize for services to European unity