Viktor Imantovich Alksnis

Виктор Имантович Алкснис
Soviet communism USSR → Russia Latvian 1950–2025 ○ Stroke

Leader of the Soyuz faction who nearly turned a parliamentary session into a constitutional coup

On 17 June 1991, as the concluding speaker of the session, Alksnis told the Supreme Soviet that the Union Treaty was unconstitutional and that deputies must back Pavlov's Cabinet because it 'works for the USSR, for the preservation of this state.'

A Soviet Air Force colonel of Latvian descent who became the most visible hardliner in the USSR Congress of People's Deputies. As co-chairman of the Soyuz faction, he demanded martial law, called for Gorbachev's ouster, and on 17 June 1991 urged an immediate vote on Pavlov's emergency-powers resolution, drawing the accusation that he was staging a constitutional coup. After the Soviet collapse he served two terms in the Russian Duma, was beaten by riot police defending the anti-Yeltsin parliament in 1993, and spent his last decades as an unreconstructed Soviet patriot.

Activities and affiliations

Career Timeline

Related historical events

Politics for preserving the Union amid its dissolution

Alksnis began political activity in 1988 by publicly opposing the Latvian Popular Front's aim of taking Latvia out of the USSR. Elected a USSR people's deputy in 1989, he advocated preserving the Union and protecting the rights of Russian-speaking residents in 1990. He initiated a Soviet law setting procedures for a republic's secession and addressing the rights of non-indigenous residents, Union property, and defense. Critics called it a law designed to prevent secession in practice. He criticized Gorbachev's course and called for emergency measures to preserve the USSR; in August 1991 he supported the State Committee on the State of Emergency. After the coup failed, he continued to oppose the dissolution of the USSR Congress of People's Deputies and joined an effort to reconvene an emergency Union congress, which failed for lack of a quorum. His politics defended the Union state and the authority of its center, while also embracing coercive solutions to republics' secession demands and political conflict.

← Back to card