People of the Revolution and the USSR

1938–2020 ○ Lung cancer

American Russia scholar who argued through Bukharin's biography that the Soviet Union had reformable alternatives and collapse was avoidable

"At each of the most fateful moments, the rise of Stalin, the fall of Khrushchev, the end of the Soviet Union, there was an alternative."

Stephen F. Cohen was the American Sovietologist who built the most sustained scholarly case against the inevitability of the Soviet collapse. His landmark 1973 biography Bukharin and the Bolshevik Revolution recast Nikolai Bukharin's program (gradual collectivization, continuation of the NEP, intra-party pluralism) as a viable alternative to Stalinism, challenging the totalitarian school's insistence that Leninism led inexorably to Stalin. Cohen championed Gorbachev's perestroika as proof that the system was reformable, helped rehabilitate Bukharin's memory in the USSR, and after 1991 condemned America's 'failed crusade' (the triumphalist treatment of post-Soviet Russia as a defeated power). In his final decade, vilified as pro-Putin, he argued that U.S. media coverage of Russia had become more ideological than during the Cold War, and remained the field's most stubborn contrarian.

1938–2023 ○ Natural causes

A historian who reopened the question of responsibility in the Stalin era

His work returned the responsibility of perpetrators, obscured by the official memory of the Thaw, to the archives.

Yuri Zhukov was a Soviet and Russian historian who studied Stalin’s era and Soviet political history at the Institute of Russian History. Working with archival materials, he helped reopen debate over Nikita Khrushchev’s responsibility as an executor and political beneficiary of the Great Terror, including the circulation of a 1938 Ukrainian arrest request attributed to Khrushchev. At the same time, his ‘different Stalin’ interpretation minimized Stalin’s responsibility for mass repression and drew sharp criticism from historians, making his work a revealing case in the politics of post-Soviet historical memory.

1940–

Political scientist whose analysis of the Cuban Missile Crisis reshaped the study of foreign-policy decision-making

We now know things that Kennedy didn't know. The Soviet Union had deployed 100 tactical nuclear weapons to Cuba, and the local Soviet commander could have launched them without additional codes or commands from Moscow.

American political scientist whose 1971 book Essence of Decision revolutionized the study of foreign-policy decision-making by introducing three analytical models: rational actor, organizational process, and bureaucratic politics. As founding dean of the Harvard Kennedy School (1977–1989), he built it into a world-class public-policy institution, and as Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Clinton, he led nuclear disarmament negotiations with former Soviet states, earning the Defense Department's highest civilian honor. His assessment that Kennedy believed the odds of nuclear war during the crisis were 'between 1 in 3 and even' became the empirical starting point for all subsequent scholarship on how close the world came to catastrophe.

1940–

The historian who argued the USSR built nations, not destroyed them, the 'revenge of the past' thesis

In sixth grade I gave a report on how the Soviet Union had defeated fascism and built cities the size of San Francisco since the war. My teacher blanched. From that day until I graduated, I was known as Comrade Suny.

An Armenian-American historian who transformed the paradigm of Soviet nationalities studies. In his 1993 book The Revenge of the Past, he overturned the Cold War consensus that the Soviet system repressed and Russified nationalities, arguing instead that Soviet nationality policy, through territorial demarcation, language codification, and ethnic bureaucracies, institutionalized and built national identities, ultimately creating the very nations that would destroy the Union. This 'revenge of the past' thesis became the dominant paradigm in post-Soviet nationalities research. He is also noted for major studies of each South Caucasus nation and won the Deutscher Memorial Prize for his 2020 biography of Stalin.

1941–

The Spanish Civil War historian who demolished Francoist myths with archival evidence

There is not a single conservative or neo-Francoist historian who does not manipulate the evidence; what they sell are bold-faced lies.

A historian, economist and diplomat who has systematically dismantled Francoist historical narratives through archival research on the Spanish Civil War and the Franco regime. Beginning with his investigation of Nazi Germany's financing of Franco's rising while a graduate student in Bonn, he demolished the myth of the 'Moscow Gold' in 1976 and went on to show, in a four-volume Republic series, how arms embargoes and international diplomacy decided the war. When the Royal Academy of History published a national biographical dictionary in 2011 that failed even to call Franco a dictator, Viñas rallied thirty historians and produced a 976-page counter-dictionary, En el combate por la Historia (2012), a watershed in Spain's 'history wars'.

1941–

The post-revisionist historian who, after the Soviet archives opened, argued Stalin bore primary responsibility for the Cold War

It took Stalin, responding predictably to his own authoritarian, paranoid, and narcissistic predisposition, to lock the chain of causation into place.

An American Cold War historian whose 1972 first book, The United States and the Origins of the Cold War, founded the post-revisionist school by arguing that neither superpower bore sole responsibility. After the Soviet archives opened in the 1990s, his 1997 We Now Know reversed course: using newly available documents, Gaddis contended that Stalin's personality and decisions were the decisive cause of the Cold War, a shift widely seen as a return to the orthodox interpretation. He won the 2012 Pulitzer Prize for his authorized biography of George F. Kennan, and as Yale's Robert A. Lovett Professor was hailed by The New York Times as 'the dean of Cold War historians.' His intellectual arc from post-revisionism back toward orthodoxy is itself a map of how Cold War history has been rewritten as evidence has emerged.

1941–

An economic historian who traced the bureaucracy of Soviet planning

In the final 1938 Politburo transcript Gregory unearthed, Stalin explained the purge: 'I explain it by the fact that we were engaged in great deeds.'

Paul R. Gregory is an American economic historian whose work examines the Russian and Soviet economies. Combining statistical analysis with interviews, he studied how Soviet bureaucracies and planners actually operated and helped preserve officials’ testimony through the Soviet Interview Project. His 2000 retrospective on the Soviet planned economy, co-authored with Yuri Olsevich, interpreted the Kosygin reform as an attempt to combine directive planning with profit incentives without resolving their institutional tension.

1941–

British historian whose 'Castro' argued US hostility pushed Cuba toward socialism

His 1990 'Castro' is cited as a leading statement of the thesis that US hostility pushed Cuba toward communism and dependence on the USSR, casting Castro as a nationalist and anti-imperialist in the vein of José Martí.

A British historian born in 1941, Professor Emeritus of Contemporary Spanish Studies at the London School of Economics. He took an MA in Latin American Studies at the University of London's Latin American Institute and a doctorate in history at the LSE, and held a Senior Lectureship at Goldsmiths, University of London. Appointed to an LSE Readership in Contemporary Spanish Studies in 1996, he became Assistant Director of the Cañada Blanch Centre for Contemporary Spanish Studies and later Professor in the Department of Government and the European Institute, and has been Emeritus Professor in the Government Department since 2006. He describes his research interests as centring on contemporary Spanish history, with the political career of Fidel Castro, the Cuban Revolution and Cuba-United States relations as another area of expertise.

1941–

Revisionist trailblazer who reconstructed Soviet social history 'from below'

'Nothing fails like failure, and for historians approaching the revolution's centenary the disappearance of the Soviet Union casts a pall.' ('What's Left?', LRB, 2017)

The Australian-born historian who led the revisionist school of Soviet studies. In the 1970s and 1980s, with works like Education and Social Mobility, The Russian Revolution, Stalin's Peasants, and Everyday Stalinism, she pioneered a 'history from below' that read the Soviet system through the eyes of workers, peasants, and city-dwellers rather than the state and its leaders. In her 2017 LRB essay 'What's Left?', she surveyed the centenary histories of the October Revolution and mapped the three dominant frameworks (the totalitarian model, revisionist social history, and the post-1991 consensus that the revolution was a 'historical dead end'), arguing that the revolution's path to Stalinism was the product of social dynamics, not inevitability, a stance that unsettled both Cold War orthodoxy and its Marxist critics.

1941–

A historian who recast the international history of Japan's surrender

Japan's surrender in August 1945 cannot be explained by the atomic bomb alone.

Tsuyoshi Hasegawa is a Japanese-American historian of modern Russian and Soviet history, the Cold War, and Russo-Japanese relations. His work ranges across the Russian Revolution, Soviet-Japanese relations, and the international history of the Pacific War's end, linking diplomacy to social and political change. His major book, Racing the Enemy, reopened debate over Japan's surrender by arguing that the Soviet declaration of war and invasion in August 1945, not the atomic bombings alone, decisively altered Japan's strategic options.

1941–

An ethnologist who challenged the nation as a fixed essence

He described the nation as a powerful metaphor that political actors compete to monopolize.

Valery Tishkov is a Russian ethnologist and social anthropologist known for studying ethnicity, nationalism, and interethnic conflict. He treated nations less as naturally given communities than as categories mobilized and reconstructed by political actors and elites, an approach crystallized in Ethnicity, Nationalism and Conflict in and after the Soviet Union: The Mind Aflame. As Minister for Nationalities in 1992, he connected scholarly analysis of ethnicity to the governing problems of a multiethnic state and the prevention of conflict. His constructivist interpretation became one pole of debate over whether nationalism is chiefly elite-made or also an autonomous expression of popular experience.

1941–

A biographer who reshaped the study of Soviet leadership

In the biography's preface Taubman called Khrushchev "a complex man whose story combines triumph and tragedy for his country as well as himself."

William Taubman is an American political scientist and historian of Soviet politics and the Cold War. After years of research, he published Khrushchev: The Man and His Era in 2003, a biography that won the 2004 Pulitzer Prize for Biography. The book presents Khrushchev as both an heir to and a critic of Stalinism, placing the secret speech at the Twentieth Party Congress within the leader’s character and institutional setting. Taubman also wrote studies of Gorbachev and Stalin’s American policy, tracing the relationship between Soviet leadership and international politics.

1943–

The revisionist historian who recast the Korean War as fundamentally a civil war

"Civil wars do not start: they come" (The Origins of the Korean War)

An American historian of East Asia whose two-volume The Origins of the Korean War (1981, 1990) recast the conflict not as an international Cold War clash but as a civil war rooted in Japanese colonial rule and post-liberation social conflict. As Gustavus F. and Ann M. Swift Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago, he fundamentally reshaped how American scholarship understands the Korean War, earning the John K. Fairbank Prize and the Kim Dae-jung Academic Award. His work directly challenged the traditionalist Cold War narrative, igniting fierce historiographical debate and shifting the paradigm of modern Korean history.

1943–

Economist who began with NEP studies and framed the Kosygin-reform debate

The reform stalled, the country entered a period of stagnation, and that stagnation ultimately predetermined the decline of the socialist economy in the USSR.

Yuri Goland is a Russian economist whose work began with the study of the Soviet New Economic Policy (NEP) and monetary reform. After graduating from Moscow State University's physics faculty, he worked for decades in physical-sciences research before turning to economics in the 1990s, focusing on reconstructing the history of NEP-era policy debates. In 2010 he co-authored with Alexander Nekipelov 'The Kosygin Reform: A Missed Chance or a Mirage?', which crystallized the central question of post-Soviet historiography on the reform.

1944–

A mathematical demographer who made mortality and life expectancy legible

His calculation that male life expectancy rose by 3.2 years to 65 in 1987 translated the policy debate into the language of mortality.

Evgeny Andreev is a demographer who combined mathematical rigor with practical statistical work to study mortality in Russia and the Soviet Union. His decomposition method made it possible to trace changes in life expectancy by age and cause of death, while his calculation of a 3.2-year rise in male life expectancy to 65 by 1987 became a key measure of the health outcome associated with the anti-alcohol campaign. His research on alcohol-related mortality placed policy effects within longer statistical and methodological contexts rather than reducing them to a simple political narrative.

1944–

A historian who traces the Russian question through Soviet history

Over the years I became convinced that the Leningrad Affair cannot be understood in essence apart from the history of the 'Russian question' throughout the existence of Soviet Russia, from 1917 to this day.

Vladimir Dmitrievich Kuznechevsky is a Russian historian and Doctor of Historical Sciences who studies the political history of the Soviet Union and Russia. His writings examine Stalin-era power and the nationalities policy of the state, most notably interpreting the Leningrad Affair as a conflict over the status of the Russian republic and Russian leadership cadres. This approach treats the affair not simply as a struggle for office but as part of the unresolved “Russian question” within the Soviet system, making his work a significant and contested historiographical intervention.

1945–

The preeminent chronicler of Soviet memory politics who traced the Lenin cult and the Great Patriotic War myth

"People need to value what they have, and what Russians have always had is loss."

Born in 1945 to Russian Jewish immigrants, Nina Tumarkin is an American historian of Russia who has taught Soviet history and memory politics at Wellesley College since 1975. Her first book, Lenin Lives! The Lenin Cult in Soviet Russia (1983), won the Wilson Prize, and her definitive study The Living and the Dead: The Rise and Fall of the Cult of World War II in Russia (1994) demonstrated how Stalin suppressed war memory, Brezhnev elevated it into a cult, and the cult was contested after 1985. One of six Soviet experts who briefed President Reagan before the 1985 Geneva Summit, she later learned that President Clinton read her book before his 1995 Moscow Victory Day visit and called it 'a great book.'

1945–

The US diplomatic historian who reframed the Korean War as a substitute for World War III and led the post-revisionist challenge to Cumings

"In many ways, the Korean War was the dress rehearsal for World War III. Since we avoided that third global war, veterans of Korea should have a sense they were involved in a very important event that was absolutely critical to shaping the world of today."

A US diplomatic historian and the leading post-revisionist scholar of the Korean War, Stueck argued in his 1995 The Korean War: An International History that the conflict functioned, by its timing, course, and outcome, as a substitute for World War III. Drawing on archives from seven countries, he pushed back against Bruce Cumings's revisionist framing of the war as primarily a civil conflict, re-situating it within the international politics of the Cold War. Over three decades at the University of Georgia, he established the diplomatic-history paradigm of Korean War studies and helped move the conflict from the 'forgotten war' to a central theater of Cold War history.

1946–2009 ○ Natural causes

Russian general-major and insider historian of the Afghan war

He wrote Tragedy and Valour of Afghanistan (1995) from his vantage point as closest aide in the Operational Group in Afghanistan, drawing on little-known and secret archival material and on the testimony of participants.

Aleksandr Lyakhovsky was a Russian military figure and military-historical writer, born in Tbilisi on 5 February 1946 and dead in Moscow on 3 February 2009. He graduated with the gold medal from the Baku Higher Combined-Arms Command School in 1968 and took part in the events in Czechoslovakia, then graduated with distinction from the Frunze Military Academy in 1977 and spent eight years at the General Staff Main Operations Directorate on military cooperation with African countries. From 1987 to 1989 he served in the USSR Defence Ministry Operational Group in Afghanistan as the closest aide to its head, Varennikov, until the withdrawal ended, and in 1990 became first deputy chief of the Operations Directorate of the Ground Forces Main Staff. He retired to the reserve in 2002 at the rank of general-mayor.

1946–

The American historian whose Beria biography revealed the paradox of Stalin's executioner as unlikely reformer

The New York Times described her as "the West's foremost scholar" of the KGB.

Amy Knight is an American historian of the Soviet Union and Russia, described by The New York Times as "the West's foremost scholar" of the KGB. Her 1993 biography Beria: Stalin's First Lieutenant was the first comprehensive scholarly study of Lavrentii Beria in English, drawing on newly opened Soviet archives to reveal a more complex figure than the caricature of a sadistic police chief: a man who, in the power vacuum after Stalin's death, sought to liberalize the Soviet system before Khrushchev crushed him. Knight's work spans from the Kirov murder to Putin-era political killings, but the Beria paradox remains her defining contribution: the argument that the Gulag's architect became, briefly and fatefully, an unlikely voice for reform.