The economic administrator who led Ukraine's government for 11 years, caught between Stalin's demands and the famine
In June 1932, after a fifteen-day tour of starving villages in Kyiv and Vinnytsia, Chubar requested one million poods of emergency grain from Stalin. Two months later Stalin wrote to Kaganovich: 'Chubar is not a leader.'
An economic administrator of Ukrainian peasant origin who joined the Bolsheviks at sixteen, he served as Chairman of the Ukrainian SSR's Council of People's Commissars for eleven years from 1923, driving industrialisation and collectivisation. During the 1932–33 famine he was one of the few senior leaders who formally requested emergency grain relief from Stalin, a stance that brought him into repeated conflict with Moscow. Elevated to full Politburo membership in 1935, he was arrested in 1938 on fabricated charges of being a German agent and shot the following year during the Great Terror.
Career Timeline
- 1907Organised Social Democratic circles in factory districts; joined RSDLP at 16
- 1911–1917Factory worker in Kramatorsk, Mariupol, Moscow, Petrograd; underground activism
- 1917Member of Petrograd Central Council of Factory Committees; commissar to Main Artillery Directorate during October Revolution
- 1918–1923Chairman of GOMZa, member of VSNKh Presidium; chairman of Organisational Bureau for Restoration of Ukrainian Industry
- 1921–1923Chairman of Ukrainian VSNKh and Central Coal Industry Administration
- 1923–1934Chairman of Sovnarkom Ukrainian SSR (11 years); led industrialisation and collectivisation
- 1923–1925, 1934–1938Deputy Chairman of USSR Sovnarkom
- 1926–1935Candidate member of Politburo CC VKP(b)
- 1935–1938Full member of Politburo CC VKP(b)
- 1937–1938People's Commissar for Finance USSR
- 1938.7.4Arrested as 'German intelligence agent'; expelled from Politburo
- 1939.2.26Sentenced to death by Military Collegium; shot same day
Related historical events
- 1917.10–1918.01The October Revolutionpolitical commissar of the Artillery Directorate during the October Revolution
- 1918–1922The Civil War and Foreign InterventionLed industrial reconstruction in Ukraine
- 1922.12Formation of the USSRUkrainian government head, institutional driver of UkrainizationAppointed chairman of the Ukrainian Sovnarkom in July 1923 to replace Rakovsky, he led the institutionalization of the Ukrainization decrees.
- 1921–1928The New Economic Policy (NEP)Ukrainian Prime Minister
- 1928–1937The Five-Year Plans and the Soviet Transformationadministered industrialization and collectivization in Ukraine
- 1932–1933The Holodomor and the Collectivisation FamineChairman of the Ukrainian Council of People's Commissars; appealed to Stalin for famine relief in June 1932After touring starving villages in June 1932, he requested one million poods of emergency grain from Stalin, who later wrote to Kaganovich: 'Chubar is not a leader.'
- 1937–1938The Great PurgeTargetA deputy premier and Politburo member from Ukraine, executed in 1939.
The 1932 Famine Reports and Clash with Stalin
In the spring of 1932, famine spread rapidly across the Ukrainian countryside as a result of the previous year's excessive grain extractions. Chubar spent fifteen days in May and June visiting the hardest-hit raions of Kyiv and Vinnytsia oblasts. What he saw was catastrophic: "People were starving everywhere. Women were crying, even the men sometimes." Peasants confronted him directly: "Why have you created this artificial famine? We had a harvest, why did you confiscate it all? Even under the old regime, no one would have done this!"
On 10 June 1932 Chubar sent an urgent letter to Stalin and Molotov reporting that at least 100 districts required emergency food assistance and requesting one million poods (roughly 16,000 tonnes) of grain relief. Hryhorii Petrovsky, chairman of the All-Ukrainian Central Executive Committee, sent a parallel appeal. Together, these were the first documented top-level reports formally notifying the Soviet leadership of the famine's existence.
Stalin responded in a letter to Kaganovich on 15 June: "I did not like the letters from Chubar and Petrovsky. The former spouts 'self-criticism' in order to secure millions more poods of bread from Moscow; the latter is feigning sainthood to reduce grain-procurement levels." On 11 August he was more blunt: "Chubar is not a leader." He then proposed replacing him. Yet Stalin did not dismiss him immediately. Despite the open clash, Chubar remained chairman of the Ukrainian Sovnarkom until 1934, suggesting that Stalin still valued him as a controllable administrator who could keep Ukraine functioning. The June 1932 letters remain a central piece of evidence for assessing Chubar's conduct during the famine.
Architect of Ukrainian Industrialization: From Donbas Recovery to the First Five-Year Plan
When the Bolsheviks consolidated control over Ukraine in 1920, its industry lay in ruins after the Civil War. The Donbas coalfields were flooded, equipment had been stripped, and coal output in 1920 stood at barely 15 percent of the pre-war level. Chubar was appointed chairman of the Organisational Bureau for the Restoration of Ukrainian Industry in January 1920, tasked with rebuilding the shattered factories and mines, and from December 1921 he directly oversaw the Donbas recovery as chairman of the Central Coal Industry Administration. Under his leadership, coal production rebounded rapidly, laying the energy foundation for Ukraine's industrialisation.
In July 1923 Chubar became Chairman of the Ukrainian SSR's Council of People's Commissars, a post he held for eleven years while directing the republic's economy. During the First Five-Year Plan (1928–1932) Ukraine received a fifth of all-Union capital investment, and landmark heavy-industry projects were constructed or expanded on his watch: the Dnieper Hydroelectric Station (DniproHES), the Kharkiv Tractor Factory, and the metallurgical complexes of Kryvyi Rih and Zaporizhzhia. At the 11th Congress of the Communist Party of Ukraine in Kharkiv in June 1930, Chubar openly defended the republic's economic interests by demanding that the Ukrainian government exercise control over Union-level enterprises operating on its territory, pushing back against Moscow's centralising tendencies. He was simultaneously a loyal executor of the all-Union industrialisation drive and an advocate for republican economic prerogatives.
Yet this industrialisation carried an enormous human cost. Forced grain extractions from the peasantry financed the factories, and Chubar, as a central enforcer of that system, bore its contradictions in full. His emergency grain-relief request during the 1932–33 famine was an expression of precisely that contradiction. Confronted with the tragedy produced by the industrial order he had helped build, he revealed a fissure between the loyal administrator and his own conscience.