Georgy Fyodorovich Alexandrov

Георгий Фёдорович Александров
Soviet Union Russia 1908–1961 ↓ Demoted 1955

Stalin's chief ideological supervisor, broken by a philosophy debate

June 1947, the philosophy debate. Before 500 people, Zhdanov demands: "You described how bourgeois philosophers devoured each other. But where is the Marxist revolution that swept them all away?" Alexandrov is silent.

Stalin's chief philosophical bureaucrat. A street orphan who rose to head Agitprop, winning Stalin Prizes for his History of Western European Philosophy. Toppled by the 1947 philosophy debate; a brief stint as Minister of Culture ended in sex scandal and exile to Minsk.

Career Timeline

Related historical events

The 1946 Cultural Purge: Attacking Akhmatova and Zoshchenko

Alexandrov's most lasting mark as Agitprop chief was his role in the cultural crackdown of August 1946. If Zhdanov was the public face of the purge, Alexandrov was the bureaucrat who prepared the ammunition.

On 7 August 1946, Alexandrov and his deputy Alexander Yegolin submitted a report to Zhdanov titled "On the Unsatisfactory State of the Journals Zvezda and Leningrad." They combed through two years of publications from both Leningrad-based literary journals and compiled a catalogue of "ideologically harmful and artistically very weak works."

Alexandrov's pursuit of Akhmatova was relentless. He or a member of his staff dug up a line from a critical essay written in 1926, "half nun, half whore", and included it in the memo. Zhdanov borrowed the phrase verbatim when he publicly humiliated Akhmatova at a Leningrad writers' meeting on 14 August. She was expelled from the Writers' Union days later, cutting off her income.

On Zoshchenko, Alexandrov wrote in the report that "in Zoshchenko's depiction, Soviet people are very primitive and limited. The author makes our people look dumb." The coordinated assault on both writers was the opening salvo of a broader postwar tightening of Stalinist control over Soviet culture, soon expanding to music, cinema, and philosophy.

That Alexandrov himself would be felled the following year by the same machinery, denounced at the philosophy debate in a method he had perfected, captures the cyclical fate of ideological bureaucrats in that era.

← Back to card