Treaty of Brest-Litovsk
브레스트-리토프스크 조약
The separate peace signed on 3 March 1918 between Soviet Russia and Germany and its allies, on crushing terms that surrendered Ukraine, the Baltic region and with them a third of the old empire's population and much of its industry. Lenin forced it through against the party's left, who demanded revolutionary war, with his argument of the breathing space; Germany's defeat that November annulled it. It stands as the revolutionary state's first choice of survival over ideology, the starting point of Soviet realpolitik.
In depth
Why did a revolutionary government sign a humiliating peace?
The Soviet government of the months after October had no army to fight with: the old army was dissolving and the soldiers were going home. Trotsky, leading the negotiation, played for time with the unprecedented formula of neither war nor peace, waiting for the German workers' revolution; when the German offensive resumed in February 1918 the front collapsed in days.
The party split. The Left Communists led by Bukharin held that peace with imperialism was the revolution betrayed and demanded revolutionary war. Lenin's answer was cold: a country without an army cannot choose war, and the survival of Soviet power was the greatest possible contribution to revolution in Europe. He staked his resignation on the vote, and only after Germany's new terms had grown harsher was the peace carried.
What was lost, and what was kept?
By the treaty Russia renounced Ukraine, Poland, the Baltic lands and Finland: about a third of the old empire's population and a great share of its farmland and industry, with an August supplement adding an indemnity. The capital moved from Petrograd to Moscow, out of the German army's reach. The Left SRs quit the coalition government in protest and rose in revolt in July.
What was kept, at that price, was Soviet power itself. And when Germany capitulated in the West in November 1918, the Soviet government declared the treaty void at once. As Lenin had calculated, the humiliation lasted eight months.
What did it leave behind?
Brest-Litovsk became the primal scene of Soviet diplomacy: the place where a state founded on the imminence of world revolution first learned, before revolution's delay, to put state survival first. From Rapallo to the pact of 1939, the precedent was summoned whenever ideology and state interest collided. Historians treat it as the most dramatic display of Lenin's realism; to oppositionists within the party it was remembered ever after as the first breach of principle.
Related people
Related historical events
Sources
- John W. Wheeler-Bennett, Brest-Litovsk: The Forgotten Peace, March 1918 (1938)
- Richard K. Debo, Revolution and Survival: The Foreign Policy of Soviet Russia 1917–18 (1979)
- E. H. Carr, The Bolshevik Revolution 1917–1923, vol. 3 (1953)
Brest-Litovsk and Germany’s eastern occupation
What did the peace that preserved Soviet power leave in the borderlands?
At Brest, Bolshevik survival strategy collided with German war aims. In Ukraine, the Baltic region and Finland, peace intersected with occupation and civil war; German defeat reopened the struggle for power.
A promise of peace and an army coming apart
The Bolsheviks took power promising peace, but Germany and Austria-Hungary negotiated from their military position. An armistice on 15 December 1917 was followed by peace talks at Brest-Litovsk on 22 December. Adolph Joffe and then Leon Trotsky led a delegation advocating open diplomacy and national self-determination. For General Max Hoffmann and the German command, securing occupied territory and releasing troops for the Western Front came first.
Russian soldiers were going home; the Soviet government could not restore the front. The ceasefire bought time without restoring military balance. Nor did recognition of selected local councils under German occupation amount to a free choice by all inhabitants. The disagreement over self-determination concerned who could speak for the population and under what conditions.
Three timetables inside the party
Nikolai Bukharin and the Left Communists hoped revolutionary war would ignite revolt in Europe. Lenin argued that fighting without an army would destroy Soviet power and demanded immediate peace. Trotsky tried a middle course: stop fighting without signing an annexationist settlement. All invoked international revolution; they differed over how long Russia could survive while waiting for it.
Trotsky broke off negotiations on 10 February 1918. Germany resumed its offensive on 18 February, and the rapid advance of Operation Faustschlag exposed the failure of that strategy. Threatening resignation, Lenin secured acceptance of harsher terms. A delegation led by Grigory Sokolnikov signed on 3 March, followed by party and Soviet congress ratification. Later commemorations of a Red Army victory at Narva on 23 February should not be confused with this military collapse.
Two Brest treaties and the occupation of Ukraine
The Ukrainian Central Rada negotiated separately and signed with the Central Powers on 9 February, exchanging food commitments for support. Bolsheviks and the Rada were then contesting Kyiv. German and Austro-Hungarian intervention restored the Rada, but occupying forces' grain demands soon collided with its capacity to govern.
On 29 April Pavlo Skoropadskyi established the Hetmanate. Backed by Germany, efforts to restore landowners' property and administrative order clashed with peasant land seizures. Occupation changed who controlled land and took grain, as well as the political map. The sequence from the Rada through the Hetmanate to the Directory, and the response of peasant armies, continues in Ukraine's revolution and wars.
Russia's treaty of 3 March relinquished authority over western territories and required peace with Ukraine and the withdrawal of Russian forces from Finland and the Baltic region. It did not fix every subsequent national frontier at once. Both German control and the territory emerging states would actually hold remained unsettled. The Left Socialist Revolutionaries left the Soviet government in protest; the July assassination of German ambassador Mirbach sought to restart war with Germany.
Ober Ost and Finland's civil war
Germany had established the Ober Ost military administration in Lithuania, Courland and adjoining occupied areas, then extended its reach in 1918. Baltic German plans for a United Baltic Duchy and Lithuania's invitation to a German prince represented different projects under German protection. They conflicted with other claims to statehood and collapsed with Germany's defeat.
Finland had declared independence in December 1917 and obtained Soviet recognition. Nevertheless, civil war broke out in late January 1918. The Red government, including Kullervo Manner and Otto Kuusinen, faced the Senate led by Pehr Evind Svinhufvud and Mannerheim's White army. After the White government's appeal, Rüdiger von der Goltz's German Baltic Sea Division landed at Hanko in April and captured Helsinki. Finnish White military operations and German intervention combined to secure victory.
Red and White terror was followed by hunger and disease in prison camps, devastating defeated Reds and their families. Domestic class conflict and the collapse of state authority made this more than a German-Russian proxy war. Germany's defeat also ended Finland's pro-German monarchy project. Finnish aid to Estonia and the 1920 Treaty of Tartu belong to the subsequent Baltic wars of independence.
November annulment and the occupation's afterlife
The armistice of 11 November 1918 required Germany to abandon Brest-Litovsk; Soviet Russia annulled it on 13 November. Yet Article XII allowed German troops in former Russian territory to remain until the Allies considered withdrawal appropriate. They did not all disappear immediately. Continued deployment and anti-Bolshevik policy helped create the setting for the Baltic Freikorps campaigns of 1919.
Brest left a brief opportunity for Soviet survival and a new arena of war. Red armies, national governments, Whites and German formations sought incompatible settlements as occupation receded. Annulment did not automatically restore the former empire. The wider struggle continues in the Russian Civil War, and the northwestern wars and treaties in the Baltic wars of independence.
Consequences
The Soviet government bought time but lost its coalition partner. German occupation collapsed in November, leaving new wars and separate treaties to determine the borders.
Timeline & Map
- 1917.12.22Peace talks open
Delegations began negotiations following the armistice of 15 December.
- 1918.02.09Ukraine signs separately
The Central Rada concluded a treaty with the Central Powers.
- 1918.02.18Germany resumes its offensive
Operation Faustschlag followed the breakdown of talks.
- 1918.03.03Russia signs
Sokolnikov’s delegation accepted the harsher terms.
- 1918.04Finland intervention and the Hetmanate
German troops landed in Finland; a change of government followed in Ukraine.
- 1918.11.11–13Armistice and annulment
German defeat dismantled its eastern occupation order.
Related people 16
Leadership10
Involved in this event as advocate of immediate peace.
Peace negotiatorLeon Trotsky1879–1940Involved in this event as peace negotiator.
German-backed HetmanPavlo Skoropadskyi1873–1945Involved in this event as german-backed Hetman.
Finnish White commanderCarl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim1867–1951Involved in this event as finnish White commander.
Head of Finland’s Red governmentKullervo Manner1880–1939Involved in this event as head of Finland’s Red government.
Finnish Red government leaderOtto Wille Kuusinen1881–1964Involved in this event as finnish Red government leader.
Commander of the Baltic Sea Division in FinlandRüdiger von der Goltz1865–1946Involved in this event as commander of the Baltic Sea Division in Finland.
Finnish Senate leader who sought German assistancePehr Evind Svinhufvud1861–1944Led the Senate that pursued Finnish independence in 1917. Heading the White government during the civil war, he sought German intervention and later served as regent. He was president from 1931 to 1937.
Ukrainian Central Rada leaderVolodymyr Vynnychenko1880–1951A Ukrainian socialist and writer, he led the General Secretariat in 1917 and became the Directory’s first chairman in 1918. He resigned amid disputes over Entente cooperation and state policy, seeking an independent socialist Ukraine.
Ukrainian Central Rada leaderMykhailo Hrushevsky1866–1934A historian who framed Ukraine’s past as a distinct history, he chaired the Central Rada in 1917–1918 as it moved from autonomy to independence. Returning to Soviet Ukraine after exile, he faced repression and surveillance.
Participants4
Involved in this event as head of the March signing delegation.
Initial Soviet negotiatorAdolph Joffe1883–1927Involved in this event as initial Soviet negotiator.
German military negotiatorMax Hoffmann1869–1927Involved in this event as german military negotiator.
Participant in the German ambassador’s assassinationYakov Blumkin1900–1929Involved in this event as participant in the German ambassador’s assassination.
Related terms
Sources: reference 1reference 2reference 3reference 4reference 5reference 6